California Governor Newsom Criticizes Trump's 'Stupid' Climate Policy in Munich - Newsom Slams Trump's Climate Rollback as a Betrayal of Public Health

California Governor Gavin Newsom has strongly criticised President Donald Trump over his decision to weaken climate protection rules. The dispute follows Trump's move to revoke a key environmental regulation, sparking a sharp response from the state's leader. Newsom accused the president of prioritising corporate interests over public health and the environment.

The US government, under Trump's direction, scrapped the 2009 EPA Endangerment Finding—a ruling that classified greenhouse gases as harmful to public health. Officials declared the original decision invalid, claiming it relied on a flawed interpretation of air quality laws. As a result, emission standards for vehicles and power plants were lifted, loosening restrictions on the automotive industry.

Critics warn the rollback could increase US greenhouse gas emissions by 10% over the next 30 years. Trump has repeatedly dismissed climate protection as the greatest hoax in the world, arguing that cutting emissions has nothing to do with public health. His administration's decision drew immediate backlash from environmental advocates and state leaders.

Newsom condemned the move, calling Trump a wholly owned subsidiary of oil, gas, and coal corporations. He alleged the president had solicited $1 billion in campaign donations from these industries in exchange for dismantling environmental rules. The governor also accused Trump of trying to revive the 19th century with his policies, adding, In three years, he'll be gone.

In contrast, Newsom positioned California as a stable and reliable partner on climate action. He highlighted the state's progress in reducing greenhouse gas emissions while expanding renewable energy and creating jobs.

The clash between Newsom and Trump underscores deep divisions over US climate policy. California continues to enforce stricter environmental rules, even as federal regulations are relaxed. The outcome of this conflict could shape emissions standards and energy policies for years to come.